UN Law and Global Security
The United Nations, arguably, is the highest achievement in global governance so far in the institutional history of mankind.
After seven decades of existence, the UN can be viewed as made up of two contrasting parts: one of which has been largely beneficial, while the other has proved to be much less so. The valuable part consists of the General Assembly, the Economic and Social Council, and the many related UN agencies that have become indispensable to the functioning of the global order and the lives of all the world’s citizens. The promotion and protection of human rights, how we use network connectivity and internet protocols, the way in which we deal with pandemics, and how we fly from one corner of the earth to the other are all largely the fruits of the efforts of, respectively, the General Assembly and its sponsored human rights covenants, the International Telecommunication Union, the World Health Organization and the International Civil Aviation Organization. These are just a few examples of what makes the UN system an integral part of our interdependent global lives.
The second, much less successful, aspect of the UN is the Security Council, charged with maintaining “international peace and security” and, under international law, the ultimate authority in respect of conflict resolution. It is also, by intention of its founders, the exclusive global organ mandated to employ coercive measures (military or non-military sanctions). However, the P5-dominated SC has failed in its mission, and failed miserably. After more than 70 years – spanning the earlier wars in Korea and Vietnam to the more recent conflicts in parts of Africa, and in Ukraine and Syria – the SC’s global security regime has witnessed hundreds of armed conflicts with tens of millions of dead, tens of millions more injured or displaced, and many trillions of dollars wasted on armaments and conflict-associated economic losses.
In resolving conflicts, the Security Council has essentially two modes of operation: intervention or inaction. On the few occasions where a member of the P5 has not wielded its veto – such as in respect of the First Gulf War in Iraq in the early 1990s, or in authorizing coercive action in Libya in 2011, essentially for regime change – to the far too frequent cases of the P5 having exercised their implied or explicit vetoes, the SC regime has largely failed. The catastrophic humanitarian situation in Syria, involving many states and non-state actors, is the latest example of such SC inaction.
This section on UN Law and Global Security, is largely concerned with not only the illusive UN reform topics but also research and policy recommendations in democratization and constitutionalization of the UN, a transformed UN, where global citizens are represented and their rights are promoted and protected.
Help us with your scholarly and intellectual contributions
This section is currently being developed. Please help us to build it with your scholarly and intellectual contributions to this vital area of international law. We welcome both original submissions and previously published articles, provided the subject-matter is relevant to the aims and activities of CUNCR. Following an editorial review, your research or analytical policy recommendation will be published on the site with full credit given to you as the author. In addition, for most international law and global governance topics, a forum for debate and space for blog posts will be provided. To submit your contribution, please click here.
Related Articles
By: Natasha Louis
By: Luis Cabrera
By: Christian Walungwa Bitela
By: Otto Spijkers
By: James A. Yunker
By: Ronald J. Glossop
By: John O. Sutter, PH.D
By: Swadesh Rana
By: Jo Leinen and Andreas Bummel
By: Shahr-yar M. Sharei
By: Shahr-yar M. Sharei
By: Alexander Wendt
By: Professor Joseph E. Schwartzberg
By: Dr. Nicos Giannis
By: Francisco Plancarte
By: Joseph Preston Baratta
By: Hanne Christensen
By: Shahr-yar M. Sharei
By: André de Crombrugghe
By: André de Crombrugghe
By: Hon. Ivone Soares
By: Shahr-yar M. Sharei
Research and Seminars
The Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future at Boston University
Who governs the world?
June 26, 2020
CUNCR's Upcoming Events at The European Paraliament
International Environmental Laws and Climate Change
Corfu & Epirus, Greece
22 July - 26 July, 2019
How to Assemble Parliamentary Assemblies Case Studies for Governments and Ngos
Brussels, Belgium
November 27-28 2018
Symposium on Security Council Reform
New York/San Francisco/Brussels
October 23-24 2018
Symposium on Regional and International Criminal Courts Against Transnational Organized Crimes
Buenos Aires, Argentina/Brussels, Belgium
Future Event
International Asylum and Refugee Laws
Brussels, Belgium
Future Event
Regionalism and Federalism
Switzerland
Future Event
Nuclear Disarmament The UN Charter and The NPT Regime: Fit for Purpose?
Tokyo, Japan/Brussels, Belgium
Future Event
International Space Law
San Francisco/USA
Future Event
Paris Peace Forum
Paris
November 11-13 2018