While Nations Fail Internationally, People Advance Interpopularly towards Omnilateralism
“We the peoples …” read the historic first words of the UN Charter. However, the United Nations is not literally “interpopular”, but legally purely international. The “people” (Latin populus,) find formal representation in the UN only indirectly and through political recognition as “nations” by the other “nations”, already members in this closed club of the “Westphalian System”. Ironically, it was the drawing of borders in faraway South-East Asia by Europeans already early in the 17th century that conflicts between these colonisers had led to “international law” ruling the claims for maritime access against the rights of colonial settlements on land. Not only for numerous wars between nations (literally “inter-national”) but also waves of globalisation by peaceful people(s) reaching and even moving beyond borders the term “international” was hitherto used indiscriminately. Here, these people-to-people i.e. interpopular relations strictly ought to be distinguished from those between nations, i.e. truly international relations; as well as private law differs from public law.
Among Asians, historically the notion of the “nation” with fought-over fixed territorial borders for “natives” has no history like in Europe, most evident is the central case of China, the origin of the long-lasting ‘Middle Kingdom’ (i.e. 中国still nowadays in its own and Japanese naming). Their pattern of thinking about the state has long been less as a comprehensive area-wide institution with fixed borders for those native on that territory to call it a “nation” in the European sense of this hackneyed term. The Chinese mandarinates of the past and present would not imagine China as only a “nation” in hard rivalry with neighbouring nations like in Europe until WWII, but rather rely on the radiation of soft power from its centre over the others, e.g. now interpopularily spreading their Global Civilisation Initiative.
Global civil society organisations — still nationally registered as private entities but increasingly involved in public decision-making (sic UN’s Guterres) — with their worldwide interpopularity open the failing multilateralism of only nations towards inclusive omnilateralism for the common good of all.
—
Dr. Wolfgang Pape is an ex-EU diplomat and scholar, former First Councillor in Tokyo and Asia Strategy lead in Brussels, now a writer and lecturer specializing in EU-Asia governance.