The Future in the Past Book Launch
Veto Abolitionists' Clue to UN 2.0
A legal thesis to invoke Security Council transformation
About
What some of the stakeholders said at
THE SAN FRANCISCO ANTI-VETO REBELLION
If a great power could cast a cloak of protection over a small aggressor power by the exercise of the right of veto, then the work of the Security Council would be reduced to complete futility.
– Peter Fraser, Prime Minister, New Zealand
– Tom Connally, Chair of the US Senate on Foreign Relations
and the UNCIO Chair on Security Council,
The USA
If unanimity really existed among the great powers the veto was superfluous. Furthermore, the veto might help to bring on war through lack of action by the Council. The Cuban Delegation wanted not only world order but world justice.
– Guillermo Belt Ramirez, Head of Delegation,
Cuba
– Dr. Bertha Lutz, one of only 6 women in 200+ delegates
with voting and signature rights at the Conference,
Brazil
– Lord Halifax,
The Acting Chairman,
The UK & Northern Ireland
– Ramaswami Mudaliar, Chief Delegate,
India
In drawing this Charter, we have recognized that it must be flexible-that we must be able to undo later anything which proves unworkable or clumsy in new circumstances, or to readjust particular features of the Organization to the happier world which we believe a lasting peace will bring into being.
– Francis Forde, Prime Minister,
Australia
THE AUTHOR
Dr. S.M. Sharei, whose specialization is constitutional international law and the UN Charter, is the founding Executive Director and President of the Center for United Nations Constitutional Research (CUNCR).
In addition to his PhD and LLM in International Law, he holds an MS degree in Computer Science and a BSc in Applied Economics and Management.