Governing AI in a Fragmented World: Brussels, Beijing, Washington — Can the UN Bridge the Gap
4 November 2026 | Brussels & Online | Hybrid roundtable
Background and focus
Global AI governance is expanding but not cohering. Rules are proliferating in Brussels, Washington, Beijing, Moscow and beyond, with no design ensuring they speak to one another. When an AI system is developed in one country, deployed in another, and used across many more, no one can say who is responsible. AI technology and its proliferation know no borders and can spread at the speed of light, but laws have borders and regions. AI rules implemented in one jurisdiction can easily be broken and breached in another. There are no global adjudication, enforcement, or sanctions regimes. Rules fundamental in one jurisdiction can be easily breached in another with impunity.
World citizens in general, and countries most affected by these rules, particularly those in the Global South, have little say in shaping them. The result: more fragmented national rules than ever, some regional and multilateral governance, but no universal or global governance.
The inaugural UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance (Geneva, July 2026) brought governments, IGOs, NGOs, academics and researchers, and large private-sector corporations together, alongside the first report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI. But a meeting is just a meeting, without concrete outcomes and steps to meet the challenge. The second Dialogue (New York, May 2027) makes the intervening months the real test: bringing absent countries into the room, building the capacity that keeps them there, and settling accountability before the United Nations.
This roundtable sits halfway between the two, asking from Brussels what New York must achieve that Geneva could not. This CUNCR roundtable hopes to advance the dialogue on raising awareness of the dangers of AI governance fragmentation, whom it impacts, and the primary steps and institutional oversight needed to ensure AI for good and its future developments.
Speakers and format
The roundtable will be a moderated conversation designed for concrete next steps and impact, followed by questions. The event will be hybrid, open to participants beyond Brussels.
The proposed panel will include policymakers from key stakeholders, European and international institutions, legal and regulatory experts, researchers, civil society and industry. CUNCR will deliberately bring in voices that rarely appear on the same stage, reflecting the cross-sector collaboration that AI governance now requires. Without that mix, a roundtable on fragmentation would only repeat the problem.
About CUNCR
The Center for United Nations Constitutional Research (CUNCR) is an independent, non-profit think tank based in Brussels. Its work focuses on the UN Charter, international law, AI governance, and the role of the United Nations in global governance. Registered in Belgium as an international not-for-profit association (AISBL), it holds observer status under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and is listed in the EU Transparency Register. CUNCR is also an affiliate organisation of the International Association for Safe and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (IASEAI).
Contact: research@cuncr.org | www.cuncr.org
Event details
Date | 4 November 2026 |
Format | Hybrid roundtable, with in-person participation in Brussels |
Venue | CIFAL Brussels, 158 Rue Royale, 1000 Brussels |
Organiser | Center for United Nations Constitutional Research (CUNCR) |